← All white papers
SkyWare ABX · White paper 01 · En-route & overflight

Billing What Is Actually Flown

How radar-based billing recovers the en-route and overflight revenue that filed flight plans leave behind.

01The gap between filed and flown

Overflight charges are the financial foundation of most air navigation service providers. In one sample ANSP, overflights make up close to 60% of all traffic. Yet many authorities still bill en-route charges from the filed flight plan or from paper strips.

Aircraft rarely fly the route they file. Weather deviations, tactical direct-to clearances and boundary crossings all change the distance flown. When billing relies on the filed plan, every extra mile is provided free of charge.

FIR BOUNDARY Filed: 310 NM billed Flown: 385 NM around weather ENTRY EXIT

02The cost of billing the plan

Industry estimates put en-route revenue leakage at 5% to 12% for authorities that bill from filed plans or manual handover logs. Even at the low end, the numbers are significant:

Annual en-route base$32.0M
Leakage rate5.5%
Lost every year$1.76M

Sample ANSP data: 100,000 overflights a year at an average charge of $320.

03One flight, two invoices

Billed from the flight planBilled from radar tracks
Distance310 NM filed385 NM flown around weather
CalculationRate × 310 NM × √(MTOW/50)Rate × 385 NM × √(MTOW/50)
Invoice$310$385
Result$75 lost on one flightEvery mile flown is billed

If just 15% to 20% of flights deviate this way, the difference adds up to more than $1.1 million a year.

04How ABX closes the gap

The takeaway

Bill the route that was flown, not the route that was filed. For a mid-sized FIR, that can mean recovering more than $1.7 million a year.

Illustrative model based on sample ANSP data: ~170,000 annual movements, ~100,000 overflights and an average charge of $320. Leakage ranges are industry estimates.